![]() |
![]() |
A
Serious Look at the .410 Slug
By Marshall Williams. |
![]() |
Several years ago, a Shotgun Sports Magazine reader inquired whether the .410 bore slug loads were suitable for deer hunting. The late and highly knowledgeable Stan Baker responded by comparing the .410 bore slug's 640 foot pounds of muzzle energy with the 12 slug load's 2400 foot pounds of muzzle energy, and the .30-30 rifle's 1800 foot pounds of muzzle energy. Since both of the latter were excellent and well proven deer cartridges, and since the little .410 slug had less than one-third of the energy of the .30-30 and less than one-fourth of the energy of the 12 gauge slug, Stan concluded that the little .410 slugs were not suitable for deer hunting. Stan was in good company. Every comment that I have ever seen regarding the little slugs reached the same conclusion, it is inadequate for deer. In fact, I have never heard of anyone endorsing the .410 slug as adequate for anything but small animals. One commentator had gone so far as to say they might be capable of killing coyotes, but regarded their accuracy as inadequate for coyote hunting. Indeed, few commentators will acknowledge that the .410 is useful for chasing rats around a corn crib. I also note that no commentator within my knowledge ever said that he had shot any flesh and blood thing with a .410 slug. I hasten to add that I have not either, but when I was a teenager and hunted small game with the .410, the small game season in Virginia overlapped the deer season, and I always carried a couple of the slugs with me. If I had seen a deer at close enough range to surely place the little slug in his heart-lung area, I would not have hesitated to try it. I had been confident about it then, and remained confident about the little slug's adequacy, I decided I should critically assess the matter. In the first place, proof that one thing works is never proof that something else does not work. As I thought about this, it dawned on me that comparing the .410 slug's suitability for deer by comparing it with a 12 gauge slug or a .30-30 rifle was an "apples and oranges" comparison. That led me to think about performance. The traditional 1/5 oz. .410 slug weighs about 87.5 grains, starts with a muzzle velocity of 1815 fps, and generates 640 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy. Compared with the .30-30's 1800 or so ft. lbs or energy or the one ounce 12 gauges slugs with over 2400 ft. lbs of muzzle energy, the little .410 slug looks puny indeed. But 640 ft. lbs. of energy is certainly something. What? Well, for starters, it virtually duplicates the ballistics of a .40 caliber muzzle-loading rifle both at the muzzle and down range. A .39" ball weighs 89 grains and will slow down about as fast as the .410 slug. In fact, this seemed to answer a question that had bothered me for many years. Why does the .410 bore slug weigh 1/5 ounce? Or 87.5 grains? In all the other gauges, slug weights are much nearer shot charge weights while the lightest shot charge offered in a modern .410 is noticeably heavier than 1/5 oz. My wild-eyed-guess (Technically this is a WEG.) is that the weight was chosen to approximate the weight of the round ball used in .410s before the Foster slug became standard. I soon realized that a number of other cartridges had characteristics similar to the .410 slug's muzzle energy, 640 ft. lbs. And its diameter. For example, top loads from a 10mm auto pistol, a .357 magnum revolver, and the standard velocity ballistics of the .44-40 and .38-40 rifles all are in the same class. All of these other guns, the .40 muzzle-loader, the 10mm auto, the .357 magnum revolver, the .44-40 rifle, and the .38-40 rifle, are considered suitable for deer, at least under some circumstances. Within ranges assuring adequate bullet placement, I could think of no reason why the .410 slug should be less effective. Better comparisons notwithstanding, I still had never shot any flesh-and-blood thing with a .410 slug, nor did I know anyone who had. Standing alone, my "better" favorable comparisons were no better than anyone else's unfavorable comparison's. Then, by happy coincidence, an article appeared in a national magazine recounting a beginner's deer hunt which had just taken place. And the best deer, which field dressed at over 250 pounds and was thought to be the biggest white tail deer taken in the US during that year, had been a one-shot kill with a .410 slug. Shot in the heart, the deer had run fifty yards and collapsed. Perfect story, perfect timing. But one shower does not an April make, and maybe it was just beginner's luck. Then, I met a real deer hunter who uses a .410 and slugs.![]() With all of this said, I should point out that I would not choose a .410 specifically for deer hunting. However, when I carry one of my favorite .410s to hunt small game, quail, doves, rabbits, woodcock, and squirrels, I will continue to carry a couple of the tiny slug loads in my pocket. I remain confident that if I happen on deer within a range which assures me of placing a slug in its vitals, I will make meat. Liberty Shooting SuppliesPatrick & Victoria GilbertPO Box 357Hillsboro, OR 97123-0357 www.libertyshootingsupplies.com The .410 gauge slugs are listed under muzzle loading bullets. The .372" diameter pure lead 140 grain slugs cost $15 for 50, plus shipping. (Aug.2003)
Reprinted curtesy of
Shotgun Sports Magazine, P.O. Box 6810, Auburn, CA 95604. www.shotgunsportsmagazine.com
|